DataLearner 标志

Gemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

在 14 个共同 benchmark 中,Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 整体领先:Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 领先 11 项,Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 领先 3 项,持平 0 项,平均分差 +7.36。

Google DeepMind
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Google DeepMind · 2026-07-21 · 多模态大模型

Google DeepMind
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Google DeepMind · 2026-05-07 · 多模态大模型

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite11 项(79%)(21%)3 项Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

评测分数

按能力类目分组,每组内按分差大小排列;共 14 项。

临床工作与医疗决策

胶着 2/2
评测项Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite分差
MedScribe70.8960 / 66Thinking High (With Tools)63.9065 / 66Thinking High (With Tools)+6.99
MedCode43.4933 / 64Thinking High (With Tools)47.6023 / 64Thinking High (With Tools)-4.11

客服与业务流程

胶着 2/2
评测项Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite分差
τ³-Banking17.50100 / 167Thinking (With Tools)9.70134 / 167Thinking (With Tools)+7.80
SAGE47.3025 / 64Thinking High (With Tools)49.5413 / 64Thinking High (With Tools)-2.24

金融

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 领先 2/2
评测项Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite分差
EMB (Excel Modeling)43.2337 / 42Thinking High (With Tools)8.6342 / 42Thinking High (With Tools)+34.60
Finance Agent v247.4435 / 43Thinking High (With Tools)29.9942 / 43Thinking High (With Tools)+17.45

图像感知与视觉推理

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 领先 1/1
评测项Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite分差
MMMU-Pro7951 / 229Thinking (No Tools)75.5083 / 229Thinking (No Tools)+3.50

文档与图表理解

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 领先 1/1
评测项Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite分差
GDP.pdf13.6065 / 122Thinking (No Tools)7.8092 / 122Thinking (No Tools)+5.80

法律

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 领先 1/1
评测项Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite分差
Legal Research Bench13.9436 / 42Thinking High (With Tools)3.3742 / 42Thinking High (With Tools)+10.57

科学知识与推理

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 领先 1/1
评测项Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite分差
GPQA Diamond83.33102 / 253Thinking High (No Tools)81.82115 / 253Thinking High (No Tools)+1.52

科学计算与科研编程

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 领先 1/1
评测项Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite分差
SciCode41.30104 / 134Thinking (No Tools)43.4099 / 134Thinking (No Tools)-2.10

维护、优化与工程管理

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 领先 1/1
评测项Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite分差
Code Migration6.1540 / 43Thinking High (With Tools)4.6142 / 43Thinking High (With Tools)+1.54

自主开发与终端任务

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 领先 1/1
评测项Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite分差
Terminal-Bench 4.0186 / 98Thinking (With Tools)0.5093 / 98Thinking (With Tools)+0.50

跨能力聚合指数

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 领先 1/1
评测项Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite分差
Vals Index36.7136 / 42Thinking High (With Tools)15.4642 / 42Thinking High (With Tools)+21.25

规格对比

字段Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
发布机构Google DeepMindGoogle DeepMind
发布时间2026-07-212026-05-07
模型类型多模态大模型多模态大模型
架构稠密模型稠密模型
参数规模暂无数据暂无数据
上下文长度1M1M
最大输出64K64K

API 调用价格

价格优先使用 DataLearner 配置的 API 记录;缺失项不做推测。

价格项Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
文本输入$0.3 / 1M tokens$0.25 / 1M tokens
文本输出$2.5 / 1M tokens$1.5 / 1M tokens
缓存读取$0.03 / 1M tokens$0.025 / 1M tokens

小结

  • Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite在以下类目领先:金融 (2/2)、图像感知与视觉推理 (1/1)、文档与图表理解 (1/1)、法律 (1/1)、科学知识与推理 (1/1)、维护、优化与工程管理 (1/1)、自主开发与终端任务 (1/1)、跨能力聚合指数 (1/1)
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite在以下类目领先:科学计算与科研编程 (1/1)
  • 胶着类目:临床工作与医疗决策、客服与业务流程

14 个共同 benchmark 上,Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 平均高出 7.36 分。

单项差距最大的 benchmark:EMB (Excel Modeling) — Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 43.23,Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 8.63(分差 +34.60)。

本页正文由结构化模型、价格与 benchmark 数据生成,不使用实时 LLM 撰写。